Archive for the ‘Courts & Law’ Category

2010 Conservative American Contract With America

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

By Peter Andrew
ConservativeAmerican.org
Leading the way Right with unique & fun
Conservative American News & Views.

The GOP seems poised to retake the U.S. House in November. However, nothing should be taken for granted. Can the GOP also take the U.S. Senate? Perhaps it is time for another 1994-style Contract with America. It would need to be simple, memorable, and resonate with Conservative Americans and Tea Partiers. Below you’ll find my suggestion.

The 2010 Conservative American Contract With America

  1. Lowering Taxes – We’re taxed enough already! Not just saying no to new taxes or tax increases, but saying YES to lowering tax rates across the board for all Americans who pay taxes, and to lowering business taxes to promote economic growth.
  2. Energizing America the Right Way!

    Trade wind for nuclear power! Let the private sector figure out if wind and solar energy can be profitable. Get the government out of the way so more nuclear power plants and clean-coal power plants can be built all around the nation right now!
    Trade solar for clean coal! Offer incentives to construct these new power plants so they can supply the energy needed for a strong economy.
    Drill Baby, Drill! Drill here. Drill now. Right now. And Drill any government agency or special interest group that tries to get in the way. Offshore drilling approved now so we can harvest oil off our shores instead of watching as the Mexican and Chinese governments do it!

  3. Repealing the Nonsense! – Vow to repeal any health care reform nonsense the Progressive-Socialist-Democrats pass against the will of the people. Promise that any unspent Stimulus money will be repealed. Use bailout paybacks only to pay down the debt.

That’s it. A simple three-step plan to economic recovery and to restoring America’s greatness! This is what Conservative Republicans should run on and promise to accomplish if given control of the chambers. If the President vetoes the items, Republicans must ask for control of the White House in 2012 and offer a Conservative Republican candidate who will make it happen.

Share this plan with your friends, email it, facebook it, twitter it,… let’s bring this country back to a position of economic strength. We can do it!

The point here is to offer a SIMPLE, understandable and honest plan Americans will support. No 2,700 page plan of bull to save the health of the nation! Just simple Conservative American values in action. Remember, more than 40% of Americans consider themselves Conservatives.

Details. Sure, we can provide details. The marketing message must be simple however. For those who want the details, they should be provided online. Details under reducing taxes, for example, can also include agreement to reduce the size of government…specific ideas for entire departments that can be eliminated or privatized. Time for D.C. to tighten its belt!

Why not be bold (Americans might faint if the GOP actually tried it) and end the practice of unionizing government workers? Why let the Progressive-Socialist-Democrats (and yes, we should CALL THEM THAT) get away with institutionalizing their political party? Why allow them to make themselves the Official State Religion? My plan, the Political Donations Choice Act (also not 2,700 pages) can be found here. America needs to stop and think about things like this. The Progressive-Socialist-Democrats have managed to use tax dollars to create bigger and more powerful labor unions which give money only to them. They use tax dollars to fund their own political agenda. Your tax dollars pay the government workers. Some of those wages go to the union. Most of those dues go to the Progressive-Socialist-Democrats. That’s why I call them the Offiical State Religion. It’s just not right, but they do it anyway. Time for all of that to stop. My plan would do just that.

New Obama Book Available Now!!

New Obama Book Available Now!!



Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

Please share this post (buttons below) with your friends! Thank you! Also, be sure to Bookmark us and visit ConservativeAmerican.org often! – Almost daily updates to the Obama Administration Scandals List!

Political Donations Choice Act

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

By Peter Andrew
ConservativeAmerican.org
Leading the way Right with unique & fun
Conservative American News & Views.

Americans should not be forced to give donations to a political party, especially a party they don’t even agree with! Yet this happens every day in the United States. That’s why I think It’s time for what I will call the Political Donations Choice Act.

If you purchased a car made in the U.S.A., you have indirectly made a donation to help Socialist-Democrats win elections. Part of the price of that car is to pay the work force. Fair enough. Part of those wages are taken from employees in the United Auto Workers union and given instead to the union, which in turn uses its money to elect and reelect Democrats. It’s just a fact.

You have a choice however. You don’t have to purchase that car. Perhaps you could buy an import or look for a non-union made, solar-powered Dr. Suess-style Crank-Car if you wish.

Sometimes political “donations” are forced however. Sometimes you have no choice. That is wrong. We know that Democrats are all about being pro-choice and letting people make decisions about their own well being, so how could they argue with simply giving people a choice?

For example, let’s say you love cars and have always wanted to help make them. You’re a Conservative American who disagrees strongly with the Liberal-Progressive-Democrat agenda. You finally get that dream job working in an auto plant and you find out you must join the union. The only choice you have is take the job and join the Democrat-supporting Union, or don’t take the job at all. It is, in effect, a forced political contribution.

What if you’re a newspaper reporter? You want the job? You join the union. The union gets part of your pay and gives it to the Democrats. If you want to be a reporter at that newspaper, you don’t have a choice. You are forced to give to a political party you disagree with. Tough luck for you.

How about working for the state or federal government? You have visions of helping the people of this great nation in your role as a government employee. You know you have to keep your politics to yourself, and that’s fine with you. You want the job. However, you also have to join AFSCME, a Democrat-party organization which will take some of your pay and use it to pad the pockets of Democrat politicians you disagree with.

Okay, you get the idea. Some political donations are forced. That’s not right. That’s not what our Founding Fathers would have envisioned. We now have a system where a tiny group of American workers (just 9% are in unions) has a huge amount of political power through the forced contributions of its membership. It is institutionalized and legally required support of the Democrat party! That is wrong.

It’s time for the Political Donations Choice Act of 2011. Here are the basics of what the Pro-Choice Political Donations Choice Act of 2011 will accomplish…

  • No more taxpayer-funded labor unions. Government employee unions will be de-certified and government employees will no longer be members of a labor union.
  • All labor unions will be required to annually give members the ability to choose if they want any portion of their dues to be used for political contributions, lobbying, or any other political activities. They can choose not to allow any of their dues to be used for political purposes and the labor union must honor that request. Furthermore, members who decide to allow a portion of their dues to be used for these political purposes must be given the choice of which party their dues will be used to support.
  • Labor unions will be required to have independent audits with full reporting to the membership about the the amount of dues collected for political purposes and precise accounting of how those dollars were spent. The reporting to each individual labor union chapter and each individual labor union member must show how that chapter’s or that member’s union dues were allocated. A full and complete audit including, but not limited to, this information must be given to each political party which was the recipient of, or beneficiary of any political expenditures by the labor unions.

That’s the basics of what I propose. It’s time Republicans stand up and quit allowing Democrats a free pass on using taxpayer dollars to create more Democrat jobs for Democrat union workers who will pay Democrat union dues which will go to elect even more Democrats!

The Democrats have stomped all over weak-kneed Republicans for years. Americans are fed up. Tea parties are taking place. NOW is the time to act boldly.

It’s time to take steps to prevent either party from using taxpayer dollars to make itself stronger. The Democrat party has taken over the school system. It has taken over the courts with radical judges. It runs the US House, the Senate and the White House. They continue to do all they can to force more people into Democrat Unions to fund their own election campaigns.

The Democrat party has become the official State Religion. It’s time for forced political contributions to end.

New Obama Book Available Now!!

New Obama Book Available Now!!


Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

Please share this post (buttons below) with your friends! Thank you! Also, be sure to Bookmark us and visit ConservativeAmerican.org often! – Almost daily updates to the Obama Administration Scandals List!

Obama to Get 2 More on Supreme Court?

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

A news report by Ariane de Vogue over at ABCDEmocrat News says the White House is preparing for the possibility of two Supreme Court vacancies this Spring….

“Court watchers believe two of the more liberal members of the court, justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, could decide to step aside for reasons of age and health. That would give the president his second and third chance to shape his legacy on the Supreme Court.”

Read Ariane de Vogue’s piece here.

Here are some possible candidates:

Marsha Berzon, lefty from the wacko 9th Circuit

Richard Paez, another lefty from the wacko 9th Circuit

Anna Diggs Taylor, helped team Obama by saying Bush broke the law

Alex Kozinski, Chief lefty of the wacko 9th Circuit

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton…gets her out of the way for a possible challenge in 2012

Attorney General Eric Holder

Homeland Security Chieftess Janet Napolitano (please no)

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Solicitor General Elena Kegan

Diane Wood, Chicago-style Obama pal on the Appeals Court

What has Obama himself said?

“SEN. OBAMA: I would not appoint somebody who doesn’t believe in the right to privacy. But you’re right, Wolf, I taught constitutional law for 10 years, and I — when you look at what makes a great Supreme Court justice, it’s not just the particular issue and how they rule, but it’s their conception of the court. And part of the role of the court is that it is going to protect people who may be vulnerable in the political process, the outsider, the minority, those who are vulnerable, those who don’t have a lot of clout. (Applause.) And part of what I want to find in a Supreme Court justice — and Joe’s exactly right, sometimes we’re only looking at academics or people who’ve been in the court. If we can find people who have life experience and they understand what it means to be on the outside, what it means to have the system not work for them, that’s the kind of person I want on the Supreme Court. (Applause.)”

So basically he wants a minority who has been trampled on. He’s more interested in that then he is in finding a qualified candidate. You can bet your life he will have a pro-abortion litmus test as well.

Fox News has a list of possible names from last time too. One on their list is wacko, lefty nut-job Harold Koh. Koh is featured on our Official Obama Administration Scandals List. Koh would be the most outrageous pick of all…so he probably has a good shot!

Koh was number 5 on the Top Ten Obama Appointment Scandals List:

“Harold Sharia Law Koh! – The New York Post reports Obama’s nominee to be the State Department’s top legal advisor, Harold Koh believes, “JUDGES should interpret the Constitution according to other nations’ legal “norms.” He also believes Sharia law could apply to disputes in US courts! Koh has also stated the United States constitutes an “axis of disobedience” along with North Korea and Saddam-era Iraq. Those are the views of the man on track to become one of the US government’s top lawyers. Harold Koh was actually the Dean of Yale Law School. UPDATE 6/29/9 Oliver North reports: “the U.S. Senate confirmed the appointment of Harold Koh…The 62 to 35 vote means that Mr. Koh is now in a position to negotiate treaties, affect international law, and influence U.S. foreign policy. That’s not good news. Mr. Koh is a self-described “transnationalist” who “believes in and promotes the blending of international and domestic law.” According to Mr. Koh, “U.S. courts can and should use their interpretive powers to promote the development of a global legal system.” In short, he is a proponent of ensuring that citizens of the United States are in “bedience with international law.” Unfortunately the legal adviser’s appointment is just the tip of the iceberg in the Obama administration.” UPDATE 9/18/9: Koh is highlighted on the Sean Hannity TV Special, “The President’s top Ten!” Previously, he was also named to our “Obama’s Most Unwanted List!”

Earlier reports indicated possible Obama picks might include Leah Ward Sears, Deval Patrick and Looney Tunes nut-job Cass Sunstein.

Sunstein was number one on the “Obama’s Top Ten Appointment Scandals List!” Read more about him here.

Huckabee Freed Accused Cop Killer

Monday, November 30th, 2009

By Peter Andrew
ConservativeAmerican.org
Leading the way Right with unique & fun
Conservative American News & Views.

Former Governor and current Fox News host Mike Huckabee reportedly freed the accused Washington state cop killer from prison.

Fox reports

Chattanooga Times Free Press

Chattanooga Times Free Press


“(Maurice) Clemmons, 37, who had a lengthy prison sentence commuted by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee nearly a decade ago, became the prime target Sunday in the search for the killer of Lakewood Police Sgt. Mark Renninger, 39; and Officers Ronald Owens, 37; Tina Griswold, 40; and Greg Richards 42…On Sunday, Huckabee deflected blame with a statement on his Web site. “Should he be found to be responsible for this horrible tragedy, it will be the result of a series of failures in the criminal justice system in both Arkansas and Washington State,” he wrote.”

Kimberly Guilfoyle reported last night that the Arkansas sentence was 60-years. Huckabee commuted that sentence when he was Governor of Arkansas. If Clemmons is found responsible, this will be a problem for any future political plans Huckabee may have.

Be sure to Bookmark us and visit ConservativeAmerican.org often!

We need your help today!
Please consider a small contribution to help fund ConservativeAmerican.org
Even $1 will help ($50 is okay too!!). Thank you!


Peter Andrew
Peter Andrew

Hidden Tiger, Crouching Elin

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

By Peter Andrew
ConservativeAmerican.org
Leading the way Right with unique & fun
Conservative American News & Views.

Mr. & Mrs. Woods - Happier Times

Mr. & Mrs. Woods - Happier Times

Tiger Woods is in hiding. In his own home. His bride, Elin Nordegren, is crouching with him. They don’t feel like talking to Police. Do you suppose you could get away with that? If the cops come to your door, just tell them you’re not feeling well and they should come back tomorrow! Like that would work!

Woods supposedly was in a car accident in the early, early morning hours of Friday just outside his own home. Couric-BS News reports he was within his own gated Florida community when his cadilac crashed. The story Elin told police is that she heard the crash from inside the house and came running out. She thought he was trapped in the car, so she used a golf club (did she run back to the house to get that? Or does she always have one handy?) to smash some glass on the car to get him out. Something is not adding up here.

The National Enquirer just ran a story accusing the Hidden Tiger of having a relationship with another woman, Rachel Uchitel. Hmmm…

Rachel Uchitel

Rachel Uchitel Does the Splits, sort of.

Could it be that Tiger and Elin were fighting about Rachel when something happened causing his lips to be cut bad enough that he needed to go to the hospital? If so, how would he and Elin explain that injury? How would they handle the media questions? A car accident might be far easier to explain. Yeah, that’s it. A car accident.

Adding fuel to speculation is the fact the cops showed up Friday afternoon to speak to the couple and were turned away. They asked them to come back Saturday as the Tiger was Hiding. Tiger’s people called police to let them know that, gosh, Saturday looked bad too. How is Sunday on the calendar?

Listen to how the police chief words things…

“Saylor said his two officers found the 33-year-old Woods lying in the street with his wife, Elin, hovering over him.

Saylor said Woods’ wife told officers she was in the house when she heard the accident and “broke the back window with a golf club.” He said the front-door windows were not broken and that “the door was probably locked. She supposedly got him out and laid him on the ground,” he said. “He was in and out of consciousness when my guys got there.”

Supposedly? Hmmmm.

We don’t claim to know what happened. Like many others, we have questions. you don’t have to give much information about a traffic incident. So, he doesn’t have to give an interview to police. However, it is likely police don’t give two hoots about the accident. It’s more likely that they are investigating a domestic crime. Neither Woods would need to make a comment in that situation either. However, they would have to take part in the interview and go through the formality of saying they have nothing to say. If a crime is being investigated, how come the rich sports guy can just put off the police while you and I would have no chance at such a thing?

Be sure to Bookmark us and visit ConservativeAmerican.org often!

We need your help today!
Please consider a small contribution to help fund ConservativeAmerican.org
Even $1 will help ($50 is okay too!!). Thank you!


Peter Andrew
Peter Andrew

Obama: Freedom of Information Act Doesn’t Apply to Me!

Friday, October 30th, 2009

By Peter Andrew
ConservativeAmerican.org
Leading the way Right with unique & fun
Conservative American News & Views.

Is President Obama fighting in court to keep his own activities a secret?

Judicial Watch does an excellent job keeping an eye on both political parties and what they are up to. The organization is pointing out the Obama administration argued in a recent court filing that the Privacy Act does not apply to the Executive Office of the President!

This court filing came in a Judicial Watch lawsuit filed in 1996 against the Clinton White House related to a scandal known as “Filegate,” where the Clinton White House obtained and maintained the private FBI files of hundreds of former Reagan and Bush officials [Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Civil Action No. 96-2123/97-1288 (RCL)].

From Judicial Watch:

“In the Obama administration’s “Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment,” filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on September 17, the Obama Justice Department stated the following: “The White House is not an agency under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and it necessarily follows that it is not an agency subject to the Privacy Act.” However, the Privacy Act specifically lists the “Executive Office of the President” as an agency subject to the Act’s provisions.

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth had repeatedly rejected this same legal argument, most recently in 2008 when the court ruled against a government motion that would have dismissed the lawsuit: “…this court holds that under the Privacy Act, the word ‘agency’ includes the Executive Office of the President, just as the Privacy Act says.”

While the Obama administration continues to advance the legal and political argument that the White House and the FBI should not be held accountable for the Filegate scandal, former President Bill Clinton apparently disagrees. Clinton told historian Taylor Branch in preparation for a recently published book, “those files did not belong at The White House,” and that they “should have been isolated and returned immediately.” According to Branch, Clinton also said “[h]is administration should and would be held accountable.”

Read the rest of this post then add your comments and feedback! Thank you!

(more…)