By David Kraemer – ConservativeAmerican.org – Leading the way Right.
HUNDREDS OF LIES. ONE LIST.
“She has fooled, and made fools of, many, many people over the years. Those who think she would be a good president are worse than fools.” – Patricia McCarthy, the American Thinker.
Here is the truth about Hillary Clinton. We correct the record. This is the Hillary Archive. The only Official Hillary Clinton List. This list contains the Hillary Clinton lies, flip-flops, scandals, hypocrisy, gaffes and more that “Ready for Hillary” & “Correct [and by that, they mean ‘Lie About’] the Record” doesn’t want you to remember.
THE OFFICIAL HILLARY CLINTON LIES LIST – PAGE FOURTEEN
MOST RECENT ITEMS ARE ON HIGHEST PAGE NUMBER!
25 Lies per page!!
- Hillary Email Scandal # 1: Hillary Clinton’s Illegal Use of Private Email Address while Secretary of State
- Hillary Clinton’s Purple Haze
- Hillary Clinton Broke the Rules with a Gift from Algeria
- Another Conflict of Interest for Hillary Clinton – Big Surprise.
- Hillary Clinton Campaign Finance Director Arrested for Allegedly Soliciting Sex from a Minor
- Liberal News Report: Hillary Clinton is a Bitch!!
- Hillary Paid Men more than Women on Her Own Staff!
- Foreign Gifts to Hillary’s Foundation Raise Serious Questions
- Hillary’s Lack of Honesty Causes Her to Investigate Herself!!!
- Is Hillary Clinton an Alcoholic?
- Hillary Clinton May Be “Too Boring” to be President!
- Infighting & Back-Stabbing Among Hillary Clinton Fundraisers!
- Hillary Clinton’s Controversial Fundraising Tactics
- Hillary’s Campaign PAC is in Debt!
- Hillary Less Popular As People Get to Know Her!
- Hillary Loves Obama’s Move to Normalize Relations with Communist Cuba
- Hillary Clinton Pisses Veterans Off
- Team Hillary is Stonewalling the Associated [Democrat] Press!
- Hillary Clinton Foreign Policy Fail – Suggests Empathy for the Devil!
- ‘Hillary Clinton, friend of Israel? Puleez.’
- Hillary’s Pipeline Flip-Flop!
- Hillary Clinton Campaign Stops Ensure Losses for those She Was Trying to Help!
- Hillary’s Speedy Flip-Flop on Who Creates Jobs!!
- Hillary Demonstrates She Knows Nothing About Economics! Her “You Didn’t Build That!” Moment
- Hillary Misleads Voters on Women’s Issues!
3/3/15 – In a violation of federal law, the liberal New York Times reports 2016-hopeful Hillary Clinton used private email accounts instead of government accounts while she was Secretary of State. It is only the latest of her 350 (as of today) lies, scandals and gaffes. From the NYT: “Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act. It was only two months ago, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, that Mrs. Clinton’s advisers reviewed tens of thousands of pages of her personal emails and decided which ones to turn over to the State.” So, if she becomes Presidents which laws and regulations will she violate then? She has no regard for the rules and lives by the theory that she is above all laws. UPDATE: 3/4/15 As the Wall Street Journal puts it, “To wit, the normal rules of government ethics and transparency apply to everyone except Bill and Hillary…” This is a felony and a conviction would prevent Hillary from running for President.
Meanwhile, even super-liberal MicroSoft-NBC says the scandal is not going away anytime soon: “But the most enduring question will likely be political. Why did Clinton do this? Was Clinton trying to hide something? That’s already what Republicans are asking, and it’s the one House investigators intend to pursue indefinitely, ensuring the issue is not going away anytime soon.”– Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said he and other committee members would continue to investigate whether Clinton violated the Federal Records Act.
2/27/15 From Ezra Klein at Vox: “Her objective, should she run for president, would be to end partisan gridlock…
“I’d like to bring people from right, left, red, blue, get them into a nice warm purple space where everybody is talking and where we’re actually trying to solve problems,” Mrs. Clinton said. And I’d like to ride a Google Bus to work in the morning. But it’s not going to happen. I don’t work at Google. And Hillary Clinton doesn’t work in a political system where right, left, red and blue are going to meld into a warm purple. One reason Clinton lost in 2008 was that many believed her too polarizing to elect…”
2/26/15 – Stuart Varney from the Fox Biz channel reported today that the gift Hillary Cltinon’s Foundation accepted from human-rights violater Algeria violated State Department rules! Didn’t she used to run the State Department?!! Clinton failed to report the $500,000 gift as required. I guess she figures she STILL is above the law. The New Yorker explains it this way, “…it violated an ethics-review agreement with the State Department by taking half a million dollars from the government of Algeria for Haitian earthquake relief. At the time, Algeria was spending hundred of thousands of dollars to lobby the State Department… “At least 60 companies that lobbied the State Department during her tenure donated a total of more than $26 million to the Clinton Foundation,” it found. While Clinton was “pushing governments to sign deals and change policies to the advantage of corporate giants such as General Electric Co., Exxon Mobil Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Boeing Co.,” all were among the foundation’s donors. ”
2/25/15 – The liberal Politico website reports today, “…hundreds of big-dollar Bill Clinton speeches that sailed through a State Department ethics approval process while Hillary Clinton served as America’s top diplomat… If she decides to run… What limits would apply to her husband’s for-profit speechmaking or consulting deals is unclear… not a single case appears where the State Department explicitly rejected a Bill Clinton speech. Instead, the records show State Department lawyers acted on sparse information about business proposals and speech requests and were under the gun to approve the proposals promptly…”
2/25/15 – Child Rapist Lawyer Hillary Clinton may have another case on her hands soon. Her former campaign finance director has been arrested. Foxy Blondes News reports Daniel Rosen was arrested after allegedly soliciting sex from a person he thought was a minor. “Fairfax County Police officials say Daniel Rosen was arrested by a county detective about noon at his Washington, D.C. home after he allegedly sought to arrange sex with a minor. The detective, a female officer working in the county’s Child Exploitation Unit, had been posing as the minor in online exchanges with Rosen, police said.”
Clinton and Rosen also worked together at the State Department.
2/24/15 – This is an actual news story. It appears on the website for the liberal Time magazine. Time magazine refers to Hillary Clinton as a “Bitch!” They even suggest she could use that word in her campaign slogan. No, I am not making this up. Here is a screen shot…
So if liberals think she is a Bitch, why would anyone want her in the White House? And for the feminists in the crowd, why is it okay for Time magazine to call her a Bitch? Isn’t that sexist? After all, do they ever refer to male politicians as ‘Bastards?’ Shouldn’t the #WaronWomen people be upset about this? I’m flabbergasted that a democrat media outlet suggests the unofficial Hillary 2016 campaign slogan is “Bitches Get Stuff Done.” Are they referring to getting Vince Foster “done?” Are they referring to how she handled the bimbo eruptions? Maybe they are talking about how she thinks Benghazi makes no difference, at this point. Beats me. Fortune magazine repeats the same claim that Hillary is a Bitch.
2/23/15 – Brent Scher at the Washington Free Beacon has the research: “Hillary Clinton portrays herself as a champion of women in the workforce, but women working for her in the U.S. Senate were paid 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis of her Senate years’ salary data. During those years, the median annual salary for a woman working in Clinton’s office was $15,708.38 less than the median salary for a man, according to the analysis of data compiled from official Senate expenditure reports.” So she claims to be a champion for women, but when it is time for action she could care less.
Oh, but Hillary pretends she wants the press that adores her to ask women questions more serious than, ‘What are you wearing?’ #askhermore. Why not ask Hillary more about why she pays men more than women?! Oh, and th Washington Times says she pretty much only hires men anyway! “Former Secretary of State and presumptive Democratic Party presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has an image problem with women — and it’s due to what one writer dubs her “All Madam President’s Men” staff reality: Nearly all men; few women.” Update: The very next day after the report, Time Magazine reports: “Hillary Clinton is all for Patricia Arquette’s Oscar acceptance speech for Best Supporting Actress, during which she called for wage equality for women. “I think we all cheered at Patricia Arquette’s speech at the Oscars, because she’s right—it’s time to have wage equality,” said Clinton on Tuesday during her keynote speech at a women’s tech conference in Silicon Valley, Calif.” Hypocrisy (again).
2/22/15 From the Blaze: “Unless Hillary Clinton immediately reinstates the ban on foreign countries giving to her foundation and returns the millions of dollars these governments have already donated, she’s setting an incredibly dangerous precedent,” said the chairman of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus. “The American people are not about to elect a president in Hillary Clinton who could expose them to the demands of foreign governments because they dumped massive sums of cash into her foundation.” More here. Frank Bruni at the Clinton-owned NY Times reports, “…And the sources of some of that money should give us pause. As The Wall Street Journal reported, “Recent donors include the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany and a Canadian government agency promoting the Keystone XL pipeline.” …As The Washington Post wrote, the foundation “has given contributors entree, outside the traditional political arena, to a possible president. Foreign donors and countries that are likely to have interests before a potential Clinton administration — and yet are ineligible to give to U.S. political campaigns — have affirmed their support for the family’s work through the charitable giving.”” – UPDATE: 2-16-15 Stuart Varney from Fox Biz says Hillary has also taken millions in gifts to the Foundation from Wall Street and big banks, something her liberal pals won’t like (along with the fact she earned $5-mill in speaking fees and is firmly a 1%-er!). National Review Online: “Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas) described Hillary Clinton as being “on the payroll of foreign nations.” – 2/28/15: Business Insider says Hillary’s wealth will be a campaign issue. Gov. Rick Perry asks, “Are you going to trust an individual who has taken that much money from a foreign source? Where’s your loyalty?” And Fox Nation reports that the Big (democrat) media is blocking this story out.
2/22/15 – “An honest person would not need to do this,” writes Pedro Gonzales at the American Thinker. “I think a candidate for president needs to be thoroughly vetted, don’t you? Hillary Clinton certainly agrees, which is why she is hiring investigators to find out more about herself: Hillary Rodham Clinton, the subject of intense news media attention and public scrutiny for the last three decades, is preparing for another thorough vetting as she plans for a likely presidential campaign. In this case, however, it’s not Republicans trying to thwart her or journalists looking for a juicy scoop, but researchers she herself has hired. Some expressed concern that she was beginning this self-scrubbing process relatively late, and might not leave herself enough time to learn about her own potential vulnerabilities to be able to respond effectively…”
2/21/15 – Remember what a huge deal the democrat press made out of the fact George W. Bush used to have a drinking problem? Well, it seems Madame Hillary may also have a problem with alcohol. A recent ABCDEmocrat News story quotes a reporter close to Hillary, “[ABC:]Covering Clinton, what is one thing that has surprised you about her? [Amy Chozick:] Hmm. She likes to drink. We were on the campaign trail in 2008 and the press thought she was just taking shots to pander to voters in Pennsylvania. Um, no.”
2/19/15 – The Washington Times: ““Is Hillary Clinton too boring to be president? This could turn into the unspoken issue of 2016 — in large measure because the Republican field is very, very interesting,” says John Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine and a New York Post columnist. “Once a figure of intense controversy, Clinton has devolved into a piece of politico-cultural institutional furniture — imposing, sturdy, solid, stolid, dull. She just sits there, immobile while action swirls around her, taking up all the space in the Democratic living room. She’s now primarily famous for being famous; indeed, she is one of the best-known people on this planet, and has been for nearly a quarter-century.” Yeah, and she’s never really done anything! She can’t even name her own accomplishments.
2/9/15 – The liberal Politico reports, “David Brock on Monday abruptly resigned from the board of the super PAC Priorities USA Action, revealing rifts that threaten the big-money juggernaut being built to support Hillary Clinton’s expected presidential campaign. In a resignation letter obtained by POLITICO, Brock, a close Clinton ally, accused Priorities officials of planting “an orchestrated political hit job” against his own pro-Clinton groups, American Bridge and Media Matters…” Another report has more on the infighting: “The main super PAC supporting Hillary Clinton is struggling in its early efforts to line up cash toward a fundraising goal of as much as $500 million, according to sources with knowledge of its fundraising. The group, Priorities USA Action, is trying to secure 30 or more pledges of at least $1 million apiece to be unveiled publicly when the former secretary of state officially enters the race, sources say. But, so far, it has received only about 10 firm commitments, and it is encountering resistance from top donors who have given to other Clinton-linked vehicles, including ostensibly aligned super PACs and even the apolitical Clinton Foundation…” The liberal website Salon.com says, ” that an ego like David Brock is centrally involved in the process means that ugly stories like these will pop up about every two seconds..”
2/5/15 – In a practice some consider to be controversial, Hillary Clinton fans are paying commissions of 12.5% to a fundraiser to help bring in Hillary campaign money. It is strictly against the Association of Professional Fundraisers Code of Ethics for any fundraiser to take a commission based on what was raised. From the Clinton-owned NY Times: “[Mary Pat] Bonner’s contracts give her firm a commission, typically 12.5 percent, on any money she brings in. Her tenacity, ties to wealthy givers and mastery of making donors happy have made Ms. Bonner, 48, among the most successful practitioners of a trade that is virtually invisible to voters but has taken on immense power and influence in the post-Citizens United world… But the growing influence of paid fund-raisers has angered donors in both parties…” Others call her fundraising efforts “tacky.”
12/29/14 – The not-so-super PAC, “Ready for Hillary,” owes more money than it has! According to the IJReview website, “It [Ready for Hillary] has raised more than $11 million in a year, and has spent most of it during the midterm elections. And as of late November, the super PAC was already in debt. According to a Federal Election Commission disclosure, the PAC had.. [less than] $900,000 in the bank and still owed on a $1 million loan. The loan was from Amalgamated, the go-to bank for Democratic candidates and super PACs looking for a loan to run their campaigns.” She can’t sell books, she can’t fill auditoriums and she can’t line up donations. And this is the woman we are all supposed to believe is the unavoidable democrat nominee for the White House in 2016? That’s all democrats have to offer?!
12/22/14 – As people learn more about the real Hillary Clinton, fewer of them support her. Meanwhile, support for potential opposition to Hillary continues to rise. The Washington Post says, “Clinton’s 49-point lead is actually her worst performance of the year in Post-ABC polls, with her support slipping 10 points over the course of four surveys this year… Clinton’s lead is not likely to be this big one year from now. Once candidates (including Clinton) actually announce their candidacies and debates are held, Democrats will become more familiar with their options and some will certainly pick other candidates.”
12-22-14 The Inquisitr reports, “Hillary Clinton praised the Obama administration for concluding a landmark deal re-establishing economic relations between the United States and [Communist] Cuba, saying that the normalization of relations between the two countries is beneficial for the Cuban people.” However, with nothing changing for citizens of Cuba, Clinton failed to explain how it would be beneficial. According to Business Insider, Clinton expressed her approval over the recent lift of several restrictions between the U.S.-Cuba relations, describing it as a major step towards improving human rights under the Castro regime. “Despite good intentions, our decades-long policy of isolation has only strengthened the Castro regime’s grip on power. As I have said, the best way to bring change to Cuba is to expose its people to the values, information, and material comforts of the outside world.” However, nothing in the President’s agreement with Castro will expose the Cuban people to values, information or comforts that others know. Words, just words.
Vets Standing up Against Hillary – 12-22-14 From the Daily Caller, “As veterans, when we have friends who are still on active duty still going back to these conflicts without a clear mission it very much upsets us,” Dan Caldwell, Marine Corps veteran and legislative director for Concerned Veterans for America, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. ”The fact remains that Hillary Clinton was at the table and helped craft, drive, and implement a lot of these failed national security policies. She cannot walk away from that, and she cannot hide from that.” Caldwell said that Clinton has tried to spin her involvement with the botched foreign policy maneuvers of the Obama administration, but he said veterans won’t forget Hillary’s failures if she runs for president.
12/11/14 Fox News reports, “The State Department has failed to turn over government documents covering Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state that The Associated Press and others requested under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act ahead of her presumptive presidential campaign. They include one request AP made four years ago and others pending for more than one year. The agency already has missed deadlines it set for itself to turn over the material. The State Department denied the AP’s requests, and rejected the AP’s subsequent appeals, to release the records sought quickly under a provision in the law reserved for journalists requesting federal records about especially newsworthy topics…” So, what is Hillary trying so hard to hide this time?!
12/5/14 – Sara Noble at the Independent Sentinel reports, “Hillary Clinton wants us to show “respect”, “understanding” and “empathy” for our enemies like ISIS, the people who want to kill us and bring the war to us. The very same people who behead babies, cut children in half, crucify teenagers, enslave women, and torture everyone. Hopefully this will kill her candidacy because she will be an incompetent president. She calls it “smart power.” That’s a misnomer for you…”
12/2/14 – That’s the Washington Postal headline above Jennifer Rubin’s article. Rubin points out her Hillaryness is no friend of Israel. The liberal Brookings Institution (where blogger turned Secretary of State Susan Rice worked) is hosting a forum on Israel and Hillary is attending. “She gleefully joined in the ongoing pile-on concerning Israel’s housing, blithely referring to apartments in Jerusalem neighborhoods certain to be in the Jewish state in any peace agreement as “settlements.” She ignored an existing agreement between the United States and Israel that allowed for new building that did not expand the footprints of Israeli housing in disputed areas. She routinely exaggerated the extent of building, ignoring Israel’s restraint and its self-imposed ban on new building. (She continued to do so after leaving office.) While the United States did veto on her watch a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israel for building, it came with a denunciation of Israel unprecedented in its harshness…” Jewish voters need to wake up in 2016 and realize democrats are not their friends.
12/1/14 – From the Washington Postal: “Hillary Rodham Clinton’s environmental problem will be on full display in back-to-back events scheduled here Monday evening. First, Clinton will appear at a fundraiser for Sen. Mary Landrieu (La.), an embattled Democrat who favors construction of the massive Keystone XL oil pipeline opposed by environmentalists. Just two hours later, Clinton is due back on a different stage to deliver a speech to the League of Conservation Voters – a mainstream environmental group that strenuously opposes Keystone…”
“Her candidacy makes sense only if voters will be in the mood for a third Obama term.” – By George Will
11/5/14 –While ‘the Madame’ claims to be some kind of champion for women, Fox News reports 7 of the 8 women she campaigned for lost their election bids big time. “More pointed was Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who took to Twitter with unabashed glee to brand the 13 [total] unsuccessful candidates Clinton stumped for “Hillary’s Losers.” “The 1990s was a long time ago,” Paul said on “Fox and Friends” on Friday morning. “I don’t think there is such a Clinton cachet as there once was. … There is a message here about Hillary Clinton as much as there is a message about the president.””
“The elites’ belief in the indomitable Madam Clinton is entering the realm of farce.” – Ralph Benko, Forbes.
UPDATE To Hillary’s ‘You Didn’t Build That!’ Moment– 10/28/14: The Christian Science Monitor reports Hillary is trying to take back her stupid comments, “[Hillary]“I shorthanded this point the other day, so let me be absolutely clear on what [I’ve been saying for decades]. Our economy grows when businesses and entrepreneurs create good-paying jobs here in America and workers and families are empowered to build from the bottom up.… Not when we hand out tax breaks for corporations that outsource jobs or stash their profits overseas.”” –Lies! She didn’t “shorthand” it! She read it from a teleprompter. She said exactly what she wanted to say! Clyde Wayne Crews Jrs. at Forbes isn’t buying this BS either: “Most people who hold jobs or are looking for work do so at, you know, businesses, which, as it happens, are often incorporated. People were not amused. Naturally it’s being said that Clinton’s statement was taken out of context, that she was talking about corporate tax breaks or something. Perhaps she was referring to her speaking bureau or to Chelsea’s former employer NBC News? Perhaps those corporations and businesses aren’t creating jobs, and that’s her reference point…” Meanwhile, Media Matters — a group Hillary Clinton started to further her own political aspirations — also claims the statement was taken out of context. They cry and complain loudy, lamenting: “Conservative media outlets rushed to vilify Clinton’s stance after she pushed for a minimum wage increase and warned against the myth that businesses create jobs through trickle-down economics at an October 24 campaign event for Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley (D). Breitbart.com complained, “Clinton told the crowd … not to listen to anybody who says that ‘businesses create jobs,'” conservative radio host Howie Carr said the comments showed Clinton’s “true moonbat colors,” while FoxNews.com promoted the Washington Free Beacon’s accusation that she said “businesses and corporations are not the job creators of America.” Mainstream media soon jumped on the bandwagon.” — Amazing BS from the War on Women creator, and child rapist lawyer, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
10/25/14 Hillary Clinton says business don’t create jobs and raising the minimum wage doesn’t eliminate jobs, both false statements. See for yourself…
Please note the key word (in bold) that she includes in her statement… “And Don’t let anybody tell you that raising the minimum wage will kill jobs. They always say that. I’ve been through this. My husband gave working families a raise. In the 1990’s. I voted to raise the minimum wage and guess what? Millions of jobs were created OR paid better and more and more families were more secure.” Using that wording, the case could be that not a single job was created by raising the minimum wage. She could be saying that more than one million got a raise instead. She knows it kills jobs, but she wants you to focus instead on the fact that some people got a raise. It’s the union mentality that says so what if there are fewer workers, just so we get that raise. She is misleading people on purpose. She continues, “And don’t let anybody, don’t let anybody that uhm, ya know, it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs. Ya know, that old theory trickle down economics. That has been tried. That has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly.” Wrong again. First she claims employers don’t create jobs, but fails to explain her faulty logic. Instead she changes the topic to Ronald Reagan’s spectacularly successful economic plan. She announces it didn’t work, but fails to even try to defend her position. It created decades of financial growth. Typical liberal: big words, but hollow. UPDATE 10/27/14: Rush Limbaugh said today that Hillary knows these “Inane, asinine and genuinely stupid comments” are not true but she has to say them to drum up support from the fringe democrat base. “It tells me how afraid of Elizabeth Warren she really is,” Limbaugh said. Warren and President Obama said similar things with their “You didn’t build that” comments. Even the New York Times has to admit this comment was considered wacky on Wall Street.
10/24/14 – Mark Stricher at aleteia.org reports, “Hillary Clinton is coming under fire for misleading voters about the politically touchy issues of abortion and women’s rights…Clinton warned that pro-life candidates threaten women’s access to abortion and to some forms of artificial contraception. “(W)omen’s rights, here at home and around the world, are clearly at risk unless people of goodwill, both women and men, regardless of political ideology, understand that women’s rights are like the canaries in the mine,” she said, according to a transcript of the speech National Journal provided to readers… one top congressional aide to a Colorado Republican… dismissed Clinton’s critique and accused her of misleading voters. “She’s trying to pander around an issue that’s not even happening and coming across as condescending,” the aide said. “I think the tactic is the same tactic that Mark Udall has used, and it’s an insult to the intelligence of female voters. I think women in Colorado are so used to the attack they don’t even pay attention.”