By David Kraemer – ConservativeAmerican.org – Leading the way Right.
HUNDREDS OF LIES. ONE LIST.
“She has fooled, and made fools of, many, many people over the years. Those who think she would be a good president are worse than fools.” – Patricia McCarthy, the American Thinker.
Here is the truth about Hillary Clinton. We correct the record. This is the Hillary Archive. The only Official Hillary Clinton List. This list contains the Hillary Clinton lies, flip-flops, scandals, hypocrisy, gaffes and more that “Ready for Hillary” & “Correct [and by that, they mean ‘Lie About’] the Record” doesn’t want you to remember.
THE OFFICIAL HILLARY CLINTON LIES LIST – PAGE SIX
MOST RECENT ITEMS ARE ON HIGHEST PAGE NUMBER!
25 Lies per page!!
- The Biggest Hillary Scandal – This one Must Prevent Her from Becoming President – The Benghazi Lies # 1!
- Hillary Hires Hypocrite Looney Harold Koh!
- Hillary Flip-Flops on National Sovereignty
- Hillary Clinton Loves Al Jazeera Terrorist TV for News!
- Hillary Clinton Allowed Those ‘Awful’ Assault Rifles She Hates into Mexico!
- Hillary Serves as Role Model for Huma Abedin Weiner?!
- Hillary Disagrees with her Boss About Libya and Plays Both Sides
- Hillary Clinton Allowed Tyrant to enter the USA!
- Hillary Clinton: Ignoring the Constitution has Pluses and Minuses!!
- Hillary Clinton Says the Terrorist News Network is “Real News!”
- Hillary Ignores Free Speech During Talk on… Free Speech!
- Hillary Ineffective in Russia
- Hillary Ineffective in Syria
- Hillary’s Documents Illegally Distributed
- Hillary Clinton Lied about Running for President Again!
- Hillary’s Empty Threats To Pakistan! Cries Wolf Again!!
- Hillary’s Nuclear Option Flip-Flop
- Team Hillary Fought To Block Free Speech
- Hillary Grants Visa to man Barred from Country!
- Hillary Clinton’s James Riady Scandal!
- Hillary Clinton Agreed to Help Free a Convicted Murderer – Amanda Knox
- Obama Sidelines Hillary Clinton and prefers to use Fill-ins!
- Hillary Gets Her Countrywide Loan Scandal-Friend a Job with Team Obama
- The Hillary Who Cried Wolf!
- Hillary Also Cried Wolf Regarding North Korea We’re Waiting… President Obama’s Secretary of State warned North Korea not to launch its missile. North Korea did it anyway. Sec. of State Hillary Clinton: “It is an unfortunate and continuing example of provocation by the North Koreans,” Clinton told a news briefing at a conference in The Hague, Netherlands. “There will be consequences” if North Korea launches a missile” Okay. They launched. Where were the consequences? (sound of crickets)
2011 – Hillary Clinton’s infamous scream at Conservative American Ron Johnson, “What difference, at this point, does it Make?!” is an amazing admission that Hillary just doesn’t care about why four Americans working for her were murdered. It makes no difference to her. Amazing.
This alone should disqualify this woman from ever becoming President of the United States. How dare she go along with the Team Obama decision to let these men die, to leave them behind?! How dare she take part in creating and spreading the big lie that it was all about a video or “some guys out for a walk?!” This testimony was a moment that revealed her true ruling elite colors. Just say no to Hillary 2016.
UPDATE: 2-27-15: More evidence from newly released emails that Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack on 9/11, and not the result of some video. More here. And from World Net Daily: ““Remember Benghazi? Hillary stuck with the story that the attack was over an Internet video when she had contrary evidence even as the attack was going on,” [Ambassador John] Bolton said. “She left her desk at the State Department to go home while the attack at Benghazi was still going on and Americans at U.S. embassies in North Africa and all across the Middle East were at risk,” he said. “No boss I ever worked for at the State Department would have left their desk while Americans were in danger,” said Bolton.
8/6/11 Even the liberal DeadStream Media’s NY Times says Harold Koh is a hypocrite on this one. “During the Bush administration, he was legendary for his piercing criticisms of “executive muscle flexing” in the White House’s pursuit of the so-called war on terror. Even more, he was described by those who knew him as the inspiration for a generation of human rights activists and lawyers passionately committed to a vision of a post-imperial America as a model of constitutional restraint. His colleagues viewed him as not only a brilliant scholar but a “liberal icon.” Suddenly, though, Mr. Koh seems to be a different person. Just over two years ago, he became legal adviser to Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department, and in that job, he has become the administration’s defender of the right to stay engaged in a conflict against Libya without Congressional approval. He argues that the president can proceed because the country is not actually engaging in “hostilities.” –ConservativeAmerican.org points out these liberal leaders who will flip-flop on a dime are far too common.
4/15/11 The U.K. Telegraph’s other one added to our list is: “In July 2009 the president made a striking defence of the principle of national sovereignty in a speech he gave at the New Economic School in Moscow. President Obama spoke in eloquent terms of: “America’s interest in an international system that advances cooperation while respecting the sovereignty of all nations. State sovereignty must be a cornerstone of international order. Just as all states should have the right to choose their leaders, states must have the right to borders that are secure, and to their own foreign policies. That is true for Russia, just as it is true for the United States. Any system that cedes those rights will lead to anarchy.” His administration, however, has done all it can to advance the pooling of national sovereignty in Europe, and the rise of a European superstate. In her meeting with EU Foreign Policy chief Baroness Ashton in January, Hillary Clinton described the Lisbon Treaty, a blueprint for a European federal superstate, as “a major milestone in our world’s history”, and Obama’s Ambassador to London, Louis Susman, told a group of MEPs in Brussels that “all key issues must run through Europe.”
2011 – CNN reminds us of this one, “During the Arab Spring, Hillary Clinton heralded Al-Jazeera’s coverage of momentous events in Egypt in 2011. “Like it or hate it, it is really effective,” Clinton said of the network at a congressional hearing while she was secretary of state. She went on to decry “a million commercials” and “arguments between talking heads,” and “the kind of stuff that we do on our news that is not providing information to us.” The remarks primarily pointed out the growing influence Al-Jazeera was having on American viewers. But behind that, Clinton’s testimony was a top-down critique of U.S. media…”
4/12/11 Gun owners have picked up on President Obama’s latest hypocrisy over gun rights. He wants to ban assault rifles, right? Okay, so how about the assault rifles he and her Hillary-ness are allowing to be sold to Mexican drug cartels as part of the Obama gun-running scandal?! Hmmmm? Like it or not, Hillary Clinton is in the fast and furious gun-running scandal up to her ears!
From Hillary RahmRod Clinton to Mrs. Huma Weiner, democrat women seem to be willing to put up with some real weiners. Sometimes a picture says it all. We call this one “Leadership by Example.”
Hillary Loves Huma! Hillary Clinton Leading Huma Abedin Weiner. How fitting. She no doubt advised her to stand by her man. I wonder what kind of relationship these two women have with each other? And what’s with these so-called feminist leaders standing by these abusive men? Why did Hillary stand by Bill? This should disqualify Hillary as any kind of ‘leader of Women.’ She is, in fact, a bad example for feminists. UPDATE 2/4/13 Howard Kurtz writes at Fox news under the headline, “Hillary, Bill and the media: The Under-the-radar Marriage Issue,” about the issue. “…Since Bill Clinton’s extracurricular relationships go back to Gennifer Flowers, I doubt Hillary was totally unaware of his horndog ways. Certainly the Paula Jones lawsuit must have been an eye-opener… But is the subtext of a Hillary campaign going to be the internal dynamics of her marriage and yet another argument about whether she should have dumped her husband in 1998? Didn’t the country move on after the Clinton impeachment? Are the media going to buy into that? I’d prefer that Hillary Clinton be judged by her record as senator, first lady and secretary of State, on her health care plan and Benghazi and leadership skills. But a vote for president is very personal, and some voters are undoubtedly going to weigh her marriage. And that will happen, in this social media era, whether mainstream news organizations look the other way or not.”
3/23/11 While President Obama is flying around the world giving interviews, he says Libyan Leader Muammar Qaddafi may be “hunkering down.” Meanwhile, Hillary RahmRod Clinton says Qaddafi is making calls to friends to ask what he can do now and trying to find a way for him to leave the country. While both could be happening, these are certainly mixed messages to be sending out. 3/27/11 Foxy Blondes News reports just one day before Obama’s scheduled address, the administration still is disagreeing with itself!! “Obama said Saturday that intervening in Libya was “in our national interest,” but then Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the conflict, while of interest to the United States, was “not a vital national interest.” Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the strife was, rather, a “vital” interest to the United States’ allies in Europe…” 3/29/11 An Admiral today said he is aware of “flickerings” of Al Qaeda being in and among the rebels fighting the Muammar Qaddafi regime in Libya. Continuing with its plan of utter confusion, Team Obama then contradicted that information when Hillary RahmRod Clinton said there is “no evidence” of that. Meanwhile the self-describe cussing and spitting Susan Rice says we might provide arms and weapons to the rebels. Sooooooooo, Team Obama may ARM AL QAEDA?! 3/29/11 So after Susie Rice cleared it all up, Hillary RahmRod Clinton also made sure she played both sides of the issue. She said today that Muammar Qaddafi “has lost legitimacy to lead” in Libya. So, he can’t lead anymore. But, that’s not why we’re there. We’re not there for regime change. Rush Hudson Limbaugh said today, “This is classic; ya take both sides of it” so the Obama administration can “win” either way. They sit back and wait to see what happens. If Qaddafi stays, they point out that’s what they said all along: that this wasn’t about regime change. If Qaddafi is ‘removed,’ they point out that’s what they said all along: that Qaddafi had lost his legitimacy to lead. Rush said Obama thinks his path to reelection goes through Tripoli! Nooooooow, does it make sense to you? Yeah, no. Me neither. The real OBAMA DOCTRINE is to play both sides of every issue. Hillary Clinton is following that doctrine. It is what we have consistently referred to as “The Obama Pattern.”
3/29/11 Barack Obama went out of his way to tell us what an awful Tyrant Muammar Gadhafi is. Hmmmm. That’s interesting. Obama’s own State Department, run by her Hillaryness, approved Khamis Gadhafi’s participation in an internship program with a big engineering firm from L.A.! Do we always welcome Tyrants into the U.S.? Is that some kind of official State Department policy? ABCDEmocrat News reports: “The trip was part of an internship program with Los Angeles-based engineering giant AECOM, set to span just over a month, and take Khamis Gadhafi, head of Libya’s elite Khamis Brigade, to tours and meetings with high-profile universities and companies from Houston to L.A., San Francisco, Denver, Chicago, Washington D.C., New York and Boston,… But on the day… protests against his father’s regime rang out in Benghazi, Libya… an AECOM spokesperson said that instead of heading uptown to Columbia, Khamis hopped a plane and flew back to his home country that night… Less than a month later, Khamis was rumored to have been killed in an attack by a Libyan kamikaze pilot. The reports have not been confirmed…”
The President does not have the Constitutional authority on his own to authorize military action against another nation when there is no direct threat to the United States. This is a huge abuse of Presidential power. “I can only conclude that your [Obama’s] order to the United States Armed Forces to attack the nation of Libya on March 19, 2011 is in direct violation of the War Powers Resolution and constitutes a usurpation of Constitutional powers clearly and solely vested in the United States Congress and is accordingly unlawful and unconstitutional,” wrote Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA) in a unilateral missive to Mr. Obama. UPDATE: As for not following the Constitution and seeking congressional approval, Hillary Clinton says “Every decision we make is going to have pluses and minuses.” MINUSES?! Ignoring the Constitution is described as just a “minus” on a list of pros and cons?! — In his address to the nation on March 28th, President Obama tonight said “after consulting with congress” he took action. Members of congress dispute his assertion that he “consulted” with them.
3/3/11 From the Rush Limbaugh Show: “It was a Senate foreign operations subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee, and there’s a Q&A, Ron Johnson (Republican-Wisconsin), said, “I totally agree with you about the power of information. I’d like to have your evaluation in terms of the priority of our information initiative. I mean, what are the components that you want to most emphasize in that region, the Middle East, of the world?” HILLARY: (shouting) Al-Jazeera has been the — the leader in — that are literally changing people’s minds and attitudes. And like it or hate it, it is really effective. Viewership of al-Jazeera is going up in the United States because it’s real news! You may not agree with it, but you feel you’re getting real news around the clock instead of a million commercials and, you know, arguments between talking heads and the kind of stuff that we do on our news — which, you know, is not particularly informative to us, let alone foreigners.”
2011 – From the American Thinker: “In 2010 and 2011, Clinton was deeply involved in the negotiations that culminated in the New START treaty and rewarded Russia for armament cuts it was making already. There new treaty provided no recognizable benefit to the U.S. other than political cover for the Obama Administration to cut U.S. nuclear weapons stockpiles. Clinton has called the Russia Reset “brilliant.” It is a debacle.”
11/28/10 Just coming out are details leaked from thousands of pages of documents in Hillary Clinton’s State Department. Did Clinton allow the leaks to make Obama look bad? Fox reports one of the stories is that Obama and Hillary were unable to convince Syria to stop shipping weapons to the terrorist group Hezbollah.
11/28/10 ConservativeAmerican.org notes that it may well have been Hillary herself who leaked these documents to make her boss, President Obama, look bad. The two of them are not friends, despite public displays. Another story developing from the WikiLeaks illegal distribution of Hillary’s State Department documents: Hillary’s State Department and the rest of Team Obama have failed to get Qatar to stop funding terrorist activities.
11/5/2010 – According to Fox News, Hillary RahmRod Clinton says ConservativeAmerican.org is way off base in thinking she’ll run for president again! – “Asked by TV3 New Zealand whether she really has ruled out running for the White House through 2016, “Oh yes, yes,” she insisted. “I’m very pleased to be doing what I’m doing as secretary of state,” she told TV3 New Zealand.” If Mrs. Clinton actually had actually been telling the truth for a change, she would have finished her time as Secretary of State and then retired from politics all together. And she asks why she has to constantly prove to people that she is not a liar?!!
5/9/10 Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is soooooooooooooo scary. NOT! Now she is promising “severe consequences” for Pakistan if there ever is a successful terror attack connected to their nation.
Let’s see… “severe consequences,”… hmmmm. That sounds familiar. You mean like the severe consequences she promised for Iran if they didn’t comply with nuclear program UN resolutions?! Wasn’t the deadline back in January,2010? So far those severe consequences have been President Obama writing personal letters to their terrorist thug of a leader. Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew Scaaaaaaaaaaary! Or there was the “severe consequences” Hillary and Barack promised for North Korea. Remember those? If they tested another missile, we were going to get severe with them!!! The only severe consequence they received as a visit from Billy Bob Clinton who swooped in for photos and a long plane ride alone with not one, but two interns. Gosh, what will the scary “severe consequences” be this time? Another UN resolution?
2/28/2010 As Socialist-Democrats prepared this week to go nuclear on healthcare, Flopping Aces and Naked Emporer News line up the Democrat Hypocrisy!! They all, including Hillary Clinton, spoke about how awful this option was in 2005 when Republicans tried it! Now they love it?!
1/27/2010 When the free speech was negative talk about Mrs. Clinton, her team fought against it. The so-called Citizens United case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court was all about silencing Hillary enemies. BACKFIRE! The result was not what she was hoping for. – In his infamous public attack on the Supreme Court at a state of the union speech, Barack Obama said, “With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests including foreign corporations to spend without limit in our elections. I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.” The Wall Street journal noted, “…the remark itself. It was factually wrong. The Court’s ruling in Citizens United concerned the right of labor unions and domestic corporations, including nonprofits, to express their views about candidates in media such as books, films and TV within 60 days of an election. In short, it concerned freedom of speech; in particular, an independent film critical of Hillary Clinton funded by a nonprofit corporation. While the Court reversed a 1990 decision allowing such a ban, it left standing current restrictions on foreign nationals and “entities.” Also untouched was a 100-year-old ban on domestic corporate contributions to political campaigns to which the president was presumably referring erroneously.”
1/17/10 – From the Washington Post: “James Riady, an Indonesian tycoon… He’d been barred from America after pleading guilty in 2001 to a “conspiracy to defraud the United States” through illegal contributions to the campaigns of Bill Clinton and other Democrats… Last year, however, the Indonesian mogul finally made it to Arkansas. He traveled there during the first of two previously unreported trips he made in 2009 to the United States. He was allowed in only after receiving a waiver from a rule that forbids entry to foreigners guilty of “a crime involving moral turpitude,” a term that government lawyers generally interpret to include fraud. Riady’s return to the United States poses a prickly question for Hillary Clinton… How and why did a foreign billionaire stained by Clinton-era scandals get a U.S. visa after being kept out for so long under the Bush administration?” Gosh, ya don’t think Hillary might have approved this waiver, do you?!
1/5/10 – From Michelle Malkin: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no idea how Chinagate scandal figure and old family friend James Riady found his way back into the country this year. No idea whatsoever, according to the Washington Post: ‘In March 2004, James Riady, an Indonesian tycoon and devout Christian, received an honorary doctorate from Ouachita Baptist University in Arkansas. The university — which has a scholarship program funded by the Indonesian — didn’t announce the honor. Nor did Riady pick up the diploma in person: He’d been barred from America after pleading guilty in 2001 to a “conspiracy to defraud the United States” through illegal contributions to the campaigns of Bill Clinton and other Democrats. Last year, however, the Indonesian mogul finally made it to Arkansas. He traveled there during the first of two previously unreported trips he made in 2009 to the United States. He was allowed in only after receiving a waiver from a rule that forbids entry to foreigners guilty of “a crime involving moral turpitude,” a term that government lawyers generally interpret to include fraud. Riady’s return to the United States poses a prickly question for Hillary Clinton’s State Department: How and why did a foreign billionaire stained by Clinton-era scandals get a U.S. visa after being kept out for so long under the Bush administration?’ – Oh, and that $20,000 Riady donated to Bill Clinton’s philanthropic foundation? Nah, no appearance of a quid pro quo there. None whatsoever… I mean, it’s not like Hillary’s ever intervened before on behalf of her hubby’s donors. Oh, wait…oops… ‘Secretary of State appointee Hillary Rodham Clinton intervened at least six times in government issues directly affecting companies and others that later contributed to her husband’s foundation, an Associated Press review of her official correspondence found.’ ”
12/8/2009 – While, many in the United States questioned the Italian murder conviction of Amanda Knox from the beginning, Knox was indeed initially convicted of “the drug-fuelled sex murder of British student Meredith Kercher.” And guess who came to help her out? Madame Hillary. From the U.K. Daily Mail: “Hillary Clinton has been drawn into the battle to overturn Amanda Knox’s conviction. Amid a growing U.S. backlash against the verdict, the American Secretary of State has agreed to meet a senator from 22-year-old Knox’s home state of Washington… Murder appeal: Amanda Knox’s supporters have arranged to meet US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as they prepare to fight for her release… gaining support on Capitol Hill. Senator Maria Cantwell, from Washington state, declared there were ‘serious questions about the Italian justice system’. She said she was concerned there had been an ‘anti-American’ feeling at the trial and said she would be raising her concerns with Mrs Clinton.” — Nearly 2 years later, Knox was given a new trial and, as CNN reported, the jury “cleared Amanda Knox of murder and other charges, nearly four years after she was arrested on suspicion of having killed her roommate in this picturesque Italian university town. There was an audible gasp in the courtroom as the verdict was read, then an eruption of emotion, prompting the judge to call for silence. Knox herself was nearly hysterical, according to CNN’s Matthew Chance, and had to be assisted out of the courtroom by two people. The jury evidently believed Knox’s impassioned final statement to the court, delivered in a voice trembling with emotion. “I am not what they say I am — perverse, violent. … I haven’t murdered. I haven’t raped. I haven’t stolen,” Knox said in the most important speech of her life.” So, did Hillary do the right thing or not? We reported. You decide. UPDATE 1/20/2014: A new trial was held in Italy, though Knox stayed in the USA in case she would be convicted, and the court did, in fact, convict her again. She has been sentenced to a 28-year prison term in Italy, though she is not expected to return to serve that sentence.
10/23/09 White House Press Spinner Robert “Brothers” Gibbs slipped on Wednesday calling democrat Senator John F. Kerry, “Secretary Kerry.” Fox News reported, “…it seemed like one heck of a Freudian slip. But Sen. John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat and former presidential candidate — fresh back from a successful diplomatic mission to Afghanistan — is brushing off any suggestion that he’s positioning for a promotion or stepping on the real secretary of state’s toes. “…I was in touch with Secretary Clinton constantly. She encouraged me to stay at it, and I think we worked as an effective team.” Obama has also used regional Czars to sideline Hillary. He even used Bill Clinton to sideline Hillary Clinton in North Korea!
10/6/9 Obama’s Afghanistan Czar is Richard Holbrooke, a former Hillary Clinton campaign adviser… According to Portfolio.com, he’s also one of those to get a special real estate deal from Countrywide! “(Holbrooke) received loans from Countrywide Financial through a little-known program that waived points, lender fees, and company borrowing rules for prominent people…known in company documents and emails as “F.O.A.’s”—Friends of Angelo, a reference to Countrywide chief executive Angelo Mozilo.” UPDATE 10/24/9: “Caving to months of pressure from congressional Republicans, the chairman of the House oversight committee agreed Friday to subpoena documents from Countrywide Financial Corporation about its VIP loan program that offered special mortgages to members of Congress and other influential figures. Sens. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Kent Conrad, D-N.D., both received loans from the so-called “Friends of Angelo” program, a reference to the company’s former CEO Angelo Mozilo, now charged with insider trading and securities fraud by the SEC.”
10/02/09 – Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama cried wolf numerous times claiming Iran would soon face additional tough sanctions! Fox News reports today, “Obama said Iran must grant international inspectors “unfettered” access to its newly disclosed nuclear facility within two weeks.” Yeah…or Else! We reeeeeeeeally mean it this time too! The delay came after six nation talks today with Iran. Just one week ago, Hillary Clinton told reporters… While Clinton wouldn’t detail what a next step could look like, she stressed there would be consequences if Iran doesn’t show progress. “We want to see a serious effort by Iran to discuss the nuclear issue,” Clinton said, and added Iran must realize it is “at a turning point” and invite international investigators to see and verify its total nuclear program. Iran said it would “allow” inspectors. However, they did not cooperate fully. Hillary Clinton, just as she and Obama did with North Korea, had promised “there would be consequences,” instead, they get a delay and there never were any consequences. In fact, in 2013 Team Obama lifted many sanctions against Iran and failed to negotiate the release of two Americans being held in that nation.